Tobin’s Q- Is the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act Working?
Determining the Economy’s Health with Tobin’s Q
The above-mentioned sign is called Tobin’s Q, and is one indicator, however, that offers a reason to be hopeful. Tobin’s Q or the Q ratio is named after James Tobin, renowned economist and Nobel laureate. Tobin’s Q can be determined at a macro-level, the economy and a micro-level, a single company. James describes it as:
“One, the numerator, is the market valuation: the going price in the market for exchanging existing assets. The other, the denominator, is the replacement or reproduction cost: the price in the market for newly produced commodities. We believe that this ratio has considerable macroeconomic significance and usefulness, as the nexus between financial markets and markets for goods and services.”
Calculating Tobin’s Q
Tobin’s Q for a single company is calculated by taking the market value of that company and dividing it by the aggregate of what all that company’s assets are worth. Should Tobin’s Q be larger than 1, deductive reasoning shows that the market value of the business is larger than the total value of its respective assets. Essentially, we can safely assume that the whole company has a worth larger than the sum of its respective parts. This suggests that a sensible business move would be to expand the business by purchasing more assets. If the company can put new assets into use in the same profitable way as the existing one, the net value of the company will rise.
Incidentally, the precise same theory can be used as a tool to analyze the economy, in its entirety. Even, the Federal Reserve includes a commonly used measure of Tobin’s Q contingent on its annual flow of funds report.
What is Tobin’s Q Telling Us?
Now that we know the Fed even diligently relies on its estimate of Tobin’s Q, we can attempt to answer many questions, including why the United States is in the mess it is in, and how the TCJA may or may not come to the rescue. Remember that, when Tobin’s Q is larger than 1, this indicates an economy that is in an expansion phase.
Is History Repeating Itself?
In the latter 1990s, Tobin’s Q skyrocketed while the market valuation of technology companies rapidly and astronomically outpaced their net assets. During said time, most considered this state a purely irrational bubble. In hindsight, however, we were witnessing a complete fundamental turn in the landscape of the American economy, which- to this day- is still dominated by technology firms.
As the unprecedented technology expansion continued, however, our economy experienced an extended period of more-to-be-desired business investment. Even in the face of beyond extraordinary efforts by the Federal Reserve, Tobin’s Q stayed steadfast at below 1 for over a decade. Investment was overwhelmingly flowing into homebuilding, which was financed by brand new and horribly misunderstood debt instruments.
The internal combustion of those debt instruments combined with the Great Recession left the Federal Reserve with another dilemma. On one side, unforeseen low-interest rates could have the effect and cause disturbingly unstable and unmanageable booms and more importantly, busts. Other viewpoints are seriously considering that higher interest rates so drastically above zero would seal the deal for never-before-seen asset price crashes and a steep decline in investment.
Oddly enough, such a scenario is an eerily similar end result when the Fed first attempted to normalize monetary policy by minutely raising interest rates in 2015. If one recalls, the state of global affairs was near terrifying and domestic and international financial markets plummeted. This is the same point at which a near recession hit the United States.
In context of Tobin’s Q, the federal government was putting to much stress on investors to actually invest- there was an overwhelming air of discouragement. And, lawmakers were left puzzled- how on Earth were legislators going to normalize monetary policy. while also encouraging investment?
Ramifications of Tax Reform on Monetary Policy
And then came tax reform. Analysts on the right determined that lowering the aggregate tax rate on companies and permitting immediate broadening of capital, tax reform would up the return on investment; this would also raise Tobin’s Q. Interestingly enough, following President Trump’s election, the economy improved because of the likelihood that potential tax reform could be on the horizon- one of Trump’s primary campaign promises. And, sure enough, Tobin’s Q also rose.
Very quickly, the federal reserve resumed its normalization policy. Interest rates rose, and the balance sheet shrank. Now, tack on the increasing Tobin’s Q factor…and that is still the state of affairs in the United States.
Now, we are seeing some red flags; probably the most prominent being the shake-up in the Executive Branch and unsurmountable friction everywhere. Also, global conditions are not extremely favorable. Exports are at a standstill. Global markets are tanking. And, financial conditions are visibly tightening. At a very near point in time, the Federal Reserve will have no other choice but to lower rates. Export growth is falling around the world, stock markets are troubled, and financial conditions are starting to tighten.
To answer the main question: is the TCJA working? Most economists agree that this recent global expansion is directly correlated to the TCJA. It is unlikely, however, that things would have gotten far without tax reform both stimulating GDP growth in the short term and bolstering Tobin’s Q over the long term.
Thomas Huckabee, CPA of San Diego, California recognizes that many options exist when it comes to choosing the right CPA. And, the right CPA is essential and needed to guide your business through all the new legislation that has been introduced. Operating a full-service accounting firm, Tom also guides clients through the complicated process of how new legislation ramifications affect your business.